Overview

UNIT OF DIGITAL SMART PRODUCTION

Row

Publications in DiVA 2020
(fractional counts)

1.5

WoS coverage 2014 - 2020
(peer reviewed)

72.9 %

Scopus coverage 2014 - 2020
(peer reviewed)

89.1 %

Row

Notes more…

Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.

Overall Web of Science coverage for peer reviewed publications in this unit is moderate, 72.9%.

Note that the coverage numbers for Web of Science and Scopus apply to publications in the KTH bibliometric database Bibmet. If a WoS-id or Scoupus-id from DiVA can not be matched in Bibmet, it does not count as covered.

Row

Background

The bibliometric indicators referred are based on publications registered in DiVA. Only publications from currently employed researchers at KTH are included. The rolling nature of this report means that it provides more of a current overview and less of a historic stable trend, since it excludes publications written by researchers that are no longer affiliated to KTH, but have been at some point in time.

Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.

Row

Researchers at the unit

Publication data is available only after login.

Publications in DiVA

UNIT OF DIGITAL SMART PRODUCTION

Row

Fractional count

Publication volume, fractionalized

Publication volume, fractionalized

DiVA publication type 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Publications WoS coverage Scopus coverage
Article, peer review 1.8 1.1 1.6 1.3 0.9 0.5 1.0 8.2 57.4% 0.9
Article, other NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.5 0.5 0.0% 1.0
Conference paper, peer review 4.0 1.0 2.5 0.5 2.3 5.8 NA 16.3 80.7% 0.9
Conference paper, other 0.9 NA NA NA NA 0.2 NA 1.2 0.0% 0.0
Chapter in book NA 0.2 NA NA NA NA NA 0.2 0.0% 1.0
Doctoral thesis NA 2.0 NA NA NA NA NA 2.0 0.0% 0.0

Full count

Publication volume, full count

Publication volume, full count

DiVA publication type 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Publications WoS coverage Scopus coverage
Article, peer review 5 3 4 4 2 1 2 21 57.1% 1
Article, other NA NA NA NA NA NA 1 1 0.0% 1
Conference paper, peer review 11 3 9 2 6 11 NA 42 81.0% 1
Conference paper, other 3 NA NA NA NA 1 NA 4 0.0% 0
Chapter in book NA 1 NA NA NA NA NA 1 0.0% 1
Doctoral thesis NA 2 NA NA NA NA NA 2 0.0% 0

Row

Publication volume

Publication volume

Web of Science coverage by publication type

Web of Science coverage by publication type

Citation impact

UNIT OF DIGITAL SMART PRODUCTION

Row

Citations 3-year window, fractional counts

Citations 3-year window, fractional counts

Publication Year Publications Total Citations Average Citations Uncited publications Share uncited
2014 4.7 1.7 0.4 3.2 67.5%
2015 1.6 19.3 12.2 0.9 57.9%
2016 3.3 9.4 2.9 1.9 58.2%
2017 0.7 4.8 6.4 0.4 54.0%
2018 3.1 4.4 1.4 0.8 24.2%
Total 13.4 39.6 3.0 7.2 53.3%

Field normalized citations, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Field normalized citations, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Publication years Publications Average Cf Top 10% publications Share Top 10%
2014-2016 2.4 2.92 0.3 13.6%
2015-2017 1.5 4.76 0.4 27.5%
2016-2018 1.9 0.52 0.1 4.9%
2017-2019 1.0 0.92 0.1 9.2%
Total 3.4 2.34 0.4 12.3%

Row

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article, Proceedings paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 3 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 41.2%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 4 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 45.4%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Row

Average field normalized citations (Cf)

Share of publications among Top 10% cited

Journal impact

UNIT OF DIGITAL SMART PRODUCTION

Row

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Publication years Publications Average Journal Cf Publications in Top 20% journals Share Top 20% journals
2014-2016 2.4 0.88 0.3 13.6%
2015-2017 1.5 0.95 0.1 5.9%
2016-2018 1.9 0.85 0.1 4.9%
2017-2019 1.0 0.81 0.1 9.2%
2018-2020 1.6 0.81 0.0 0.0%
Total 4.1 0.87 0.4 10.3%

Row

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 3 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 45.4%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Row

Field normalized journal impact (JCf)

Share of publications in Top 20% journals

Co‑publishing

UNIT OF DIGITAL SMART PRODUCTION

Row

Summary

International and Swedish non-university co‑publications (full counts)

International and Swedish non-university co‑publications (full counts)

Publication years Publications Swedish non-university co-publications Share Swedish non-university International co-publications Share international
2014-2016 6 0 0.0% 2 33.3%
2015-2017 5 0 0.0% 2 40.0%
2016-2018 5 0 0.0% 2 40.0%
2017-2019 3 0 0.0% 1 33.3%
2018-2020 3 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Total 10 0 0.0% 3 30.0%

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 3 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 54.5%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

International and Swedish non-university co‑publication

Countries and organizations

Co‑publication countries

Co‑publication countries

Country Publications 1-10 auth 11-50 auth 51-200 auth Over 200 auth Publications (frac)
Portugal 7 7 0 0 0 1.6
United Kingdom 3 3 0 0 0 1.4
Greece 2 1 1 0 0 0.2
Italy 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Poland 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Slovak Republic 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Austria 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Canada 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Germany 1 0 1 0 0 0.1

Co‑publication organizations

Co‑publication countries

Organization Organization type Country Publications 1-10 auth 11-50 auth 51-200 auth Over 200 auth Publications (frac)
Linköping University University Sweden 5 5 0 0 0 1.6
Scania AB Company Sweden 4 4 0 0 0 1.2
NOVA University Lisbon University Portugal 4 4 0 0 0 0.9
Instituto de Desenvolvimento de Novas Tecnologias (UNINOVA) Institute Portugal 3 3 0 0 0 0.8
Loughborough University University United Kingdom 2 2 0 0 0 0.8
HIAB AB Company Sweden 2 2 0 0 0 0.7
University of Nottingham University United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.7
Mälardalen University College University College Sweden 2 2 0 0 0 0.5
SenseAir AB Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
Skövde University College University College Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Polytechnic University of Turin University Italy 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Rzeszów University of Technology University Poland 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Technical University of Kosice (TUKE) University Slovak Republic 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Technological Educational Institute of Epirus (TEIEP) Institute Greece 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
University of Minho University Portugal 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
University of Naples Federico II University Italy 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Darmstadt University of Technology University Germany 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Reutlingen University University College Germany 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Technical University of Berlin University Germany 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
University of Patras University Greece 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
University of Windsor University Canada 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Vienna University of Technology University Austria 1 0 1 0 0 0.1

Open Access

UNIT OF DIGITAL SMART PRODUCTION

Row

Open Access publications, full counts

Open Access publications, full counts

Publication Year Publications Open Access publications OA gold OA hybrid OA green OA bronze Not OA Share OA
2014 12 4 1 0 0 3 8 33.3%
2015 5 3 3 0 0 0 2 60.0%
2016 11 9 6 1 2 0 2 81.8%
2017 5 3 3 0 0 0 2 60.0%
2018 7 6 5 1 0 0 1 85.7%
2019 12 8 6 2 0 0 4 66.7%
2020 3 3 2 0 1 0 0 100.0%
Total 55 36 26 4 3 3 19 65.5%

Row

Notes more…

The Open Access type of the publications was fetched from the Unpaywall REST API. The method to determine the OA type is presented here.

In summary, the different OA types can be described as follows:

  • Gold: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is fully OA.

  • Hybrid: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is not fully OA.

  • Green: The full text has been found in an institutional repository, such as DiVA.

  • Bronze: The full text has been found on a publisher website but no OA license could be identified.

N.B.: This table is based on peer-reviewed publications for which Unpaywall could determine the OA type (necessary condition: have a DOI number). Unpaywall’s method is empirical and does not strictly equate to copyright license. As a consequence, the OA status of a given publication may vary with time — for example turning from “Not OA” to “Green” when a full text is added to DiVA.

Row

Overview of Open Access publications - piechart

Stacked area chart for publications

Scopus

UNIT OF DIGITAL SMART PRODUCTION

Row

Citation Impact

Column

Citations, open window
Citations, open window
Publication Year Publications Total Citations Average Citations Uncited publications Share uncited
2014 5.6 9.9 1.8 1.8 32.8%
2015 1.6 162.6 102.7 0.3 21.1%
2016 3.5 35.3 10.1 0.9 26.7%
2017 1.0 18.4 18.6 0.4 40.4%
2018 3.1 14.8 4.8 0.8 24.2%
2019 5.3 15.3 2.9 3.1 59.5%
2020 1.5 1.3 0.9 0.5 33.3%
Total 21.6 257.8 11.9 7.9 36.7%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Conference Paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 2 (full counted) publications with poor Scopus coverage (at least 55%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
Average field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Publication years Publications Average FWCI Top 10% publications Share Top 10%
2014-2016 10.1 2.45 1.2 12.4%
2015-2017 5.7 4.27 1.3 23.4%
2016-2018 6.8 2.35 1.9 28.5%
2017-2019 8.9 2.17 2.8 31.7%
Total 18.9 2.32 4.1 21.5%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 20 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 75.8%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Share of publications among Top 10% cited

Journal Impact

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)
Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)
Publication years Publications Average SNIP Publications in Top 20% journals Share Top 20% journals
2014-2016 7.1 1.15 3.1 43.8%
2015-2017 5.0 1.18 2.5 50.4%
2016-2018 6.5 1.22 4.0 61.9%
2017-2019 6.9 1.13 1.9 28.1%
2018-2020 7.5 1.14 2.5 33.6%
Total 15.2 1.14 5.7 37.6%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 20 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 75.8%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
Field normalized journal impact (SNIP)

Share of publications in Top 20% journals

Co‑publishing

International and corporate co‑publications (full counts)
International and corporate co‑publications (full counts)
Publication years Publications Corporate co-publications Share corporate International co-publications Share international
2014-2016 31 3 9.7% 8 25.8%
2015-2017 20 2 10.0% 3 15.0%
2016-2018 22 2 9.1% 3 13.6%
2017-2019 21 1 4.8% 4 19.0%
2018-2020 20 1 5.0% 3 15.0%
Total 55 4 7.3% 12 21.8%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 20 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 80%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

International and corporate co‑publication

About

Row